- From: Justin Wood <jw6057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 14:46:54 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: >On Wed, 19 May 2004, Justin Wood wrote: > > >>http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS3/Selectors/20040510/html/tests/css3-modsel-162.html >> >>This test makes it unclear of what /exactly/ should 'pass' or 'fail' >>(if cursor is not same for each box would it fail, IE: if cursor is not >>crosshair for 'tree' in both boxes. >> >>This should be clarified in test >> >> > >Good point. The new text will read: > > <p>Select everything in this document. The following two constructs > (in the thick black borders) should end up looking identical. You > should also check that the cursor is the same on equivalent parts > (in particular the cursor should either be a crosshair over "Tree" > and the default everywhere else, or the default everywhere).</p> > >Let me know if that is clear enough. > > > Sounds good, but my marking 'should' that implies (at least to me) that it /is/ still possible to pass if the cursor is not the same, even on a UA that supports cursor. The pass/fail criteria is more what I was looking at in that test. ~Justin Wood
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2004 14:48:32 UTC