- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 06:54:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I agree with the general shape of the proposal, the semantics and the new spec section, but I don't think the naming is great, and also dislike `default` being falsey. My proposal back from #443 was `reduced-motion: none | prefer`, which could possibly be expanded later with other truthy values, like for example `force` for when the UA is disabling all motions on its own, and we just want an MQ to let the author know about it so that they can react. I don't think the `force` value is particularly likely on `reduced-motion`, but I do think it would be more likely on other similar "preference" properties, and I'd like to get the naming consistent. `reduced-transparency: none | prefer | force` `reduced-motion: none | prefer | force` `color-invert: none | prefer | force` `save-ink: none | prefer | force` I'd also be OK with a replacing `none` with another falsey value, but `unknown` feels wrong, because it feels like an invocation of the 3-valued logic described in https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries-4/#evaluating. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/586#issuecomment-265075421 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2016 06:55:02 UTC