W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] Add 'prefers-reduced-motion' media feature

From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 16:44:47 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-265201881-1481042685-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@inoas wrote:
> The variable/setting itself declares that it is only about reduction
 not about disabling.

If you're talking about the term "reduced" in the property name, I 
think we're mincing semantics. Disabling motion is a reduction of 
motion, albeit a complete one. 

> Because of the choice of words in this PR `prefers-reduced-motion: 
disabled` is ambiguous in the first place.

This argument is a straw man fallacy. The PR does not include 
`prefers-reduced-motion: disabled` but if the value were needed a 
later time, it could be an unambiguous `no-motion`.

GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2016 16:44:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:06 UTC