- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:18:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@frivoal wrote: > My proposal back from #443 […snip…] > ```css reduced-transparency: none | prefer | force reduced-motion: none | prefer | force ``` I thought we settled that this syntax was unclear. `reduced-motion: none;` will leave many to believe it means "no motion" rather than "no preference, so motion is okay." -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/586#issuecomment-265176309 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:32:57 UTC