- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:12:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@inoas wrote: > The current wording - e.g. prefers-reduced-motion - does not allow any future granularity Not true. Future values could be granular tokens, even a combined list, if someone wanted to implement them that way. `prefers-reduced-motion: reduce-parallax reduce-scaling; /* etc. reduce-rotation, etc. */` > the falsey-value issue is also being addressed in the alternative PR I hope. Which alternative PR? Please link. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/586#issuecomment-265174560 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:12:30 UTC