W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Text that is difficult to understand. Needs to be simplified and may be have an illustrative example.

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:46:22 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1sr06vjbofpZ9xHBD3HEzFik=epSdLX6AVJRo@mail.gmail.com>
To: sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM,  <sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org> wrote:
> Name: Sylvie Duchateau
> Email: sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org
> Affiliation: Association BrailleNet
> Document: TD
> Item Number: (none selected)
> Part of Item: Applicability
> Comment Type: editorial
> Summary of Issue: Text that is difficult to understand. Needs to be simplified and may be have an illustrative example.
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> Location : introduction of Techniques for WCAG 2.0 and Understanding WCAG 2.0, Heading h3 "sufficient techniques".
> paragraph added on July 2010 draft.
> "[Begin add] In some cases it's only when a combination
> of techniques are used that it is considered sufficient. In these cases, the sufficient combination of techniques are listed together on one numbered line
> in the “How to Meet WCAG 2.0” and “Understanding WCAG 2.0” documents. Each numbered line is sufficient to meet the Success Criteria it addresses, but the
> individual techniques on that line are not sufficient by themselves unless they are on a numbered line by themselves.[end add]
> Proposed Change:
> Simplify this paragraph that does not sound clear at all.
> What does this "numbered line" wording mean?
> May be giving an example to illustrate what is meant would be helpful.
Response from the Working Group
Thank you for alerting us to this improvement in Firefox, and for
identifying the places that needed updating. We have determined that
this fix occurred in Firefox 3.0, so instead of removing Firefox from
the User Agent Notes, we have corrected them to versions of Firefox
before Firefox 3.0.

In general, we have not added the notes about Safari to the
descriptions of the techniques. Safari's restrictions are included in
the User Agent Notes, and including the Safari restrictions in the
descriptions makes the techniques more difficult to understand.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact

On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2010 01:46:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:13 UTC