- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:52:43 -0500
- To: public-coga-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJi9CqpfH4w_F=U57y7GgmYB9Cs5gD+SPcig7oL2AW71D+dG9A@mail.gmail.com>
Issue 1: General Concerns (2.1 states, "Voice systems and conversational interfaces depend on the users’ knowledge and abilities". Comment: Is this not true of all UI? Not special to voice / conversational UI IMO. Example: A comparison of mobile tablet devices may state technical features like, Computer Memory Type, Flash Memory Size. If a user does not understand these terms enough it is due to a knowledge gap and can happen to a non-PWD too. Other examples: option strategies for stocks or a web page discussing an involved topic in physics or computer programming or corporate taxation. Now if the user is well versed in the topic being reviewed but due to a acquired cognitive impairment is unable to recollect what some terms mean or they seem unfamiliar, or has problems in analyzing and choosing a course of action, it is not a problem of "knowledge". It is a memory issue or in some cases, reasoning. Issue 2: Both 2.4 and 2.7 are identical: 2.4 Reasoning: Making the Correct Selection 2.7 Attention: Making Correct Selections Comment: Is 2.7 supposed to refer to attention span and how distractions might make one lose task focus? The above is in relation to: Cognitive Accessibility Research Modules - Voice Systems and Conversational Interfaces https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/FPWD-research-modules/research-modules/Conversational-Voice-Systems.html Sailesh Panchang Principal Accessibility Consultant Email: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Deque Systems Inc | - Accessibility for Good | www.deque.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2026 01:52:58 UTC