Adam Connors
- Re: MWABP for discussion: JSON parsing vs eval benchmarking.
- Re: [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- MWABP for discussion: JSON parsing vs eval benchmarking.
- Re: Regrets for 2009-05-19
- Re: A few comments on latest draft of Mobile Web Application Best Practices
- Re: MWABP 20091704: comments
Alan Chuter
- WCAG-MWBP document "last call" before publication
- Regrets, and progress toward publication of MWBP-WCAG document
- Re: [agenda] Sprites for decorative images only
- Re: [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Re: [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Regrets today's call, progress with accessibility document
Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group
- Today's Call Cancelled
- [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- [agenda] Agenda for today's call (2009-05-05)
Arthur Barstow
Bruce Lawson
- Re: [agenda] Sprites for decorative images only
- Re: [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Re: [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Re: [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Eduardo Casais
- Regrets for 2009-05-26
- Regrets for 2009-05-19
- CTG rules: rel="stylesheet"
- CTG rules: MobileOptimized
Francois Daoust
- Comment on MWABP: AtomDB
- Re: Regrets, and progress toward publication of MWBP-WCAG document
- [minutes] 19 May 2009 Teleconference
- [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
- [agenda] Agenda for today's call (2009-05-12)
- New working draft of Mobile Web Application Best Practices is out
- [minutes] Tuesday 5 May 2009 Teleconf
- Re: A few comments on latest draft of Mobile Web Application Best Practices
gina@alierra.com
Jeff Sonstein
- Re: Regrets for 2009-05-26
- Re: MWABP for discussion: JSON parsing vs eval benchmarking.
- Re: MWABP for discussion: JSON parsing vs eval benchmarking.
Jo Rabin
- RE: [agenda] Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Re: Regrets for 2009-05-19
- RE: New working draft of Mobile Web Application Best Practices is out
John Hardi
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
Luca Passani
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
Magnus Lönnroth
- RE: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- RE: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- RE: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- RE: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
Marie-Claire Forgue
passani@eunet.no
Rotan Hanrahan
Sangwhan Moon
Tom Hume
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed
- Re: Regrets for 2009-05-19
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
- Re: [minutes] 12 May 2009 Teleconference
- Regrets for BPWG 2009-05-05