- From: Tom Hume <tom.hume@futureplatforms.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:07:22 +0100
- To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <a293dbd10905260907u20ad29a0uee61b000298e38e7@mail.gmail.com>
I took an action a couple of weeks ago to look into multipart/mixed MIME types, to see if they might be usefully related to sections 3.4.6 and 3.4.7 of MWABP[1] (ACTION-961). In particular it would seem helpful to be able to bundle many images up into a single HTTP request, avoiding unnecessary round trips to download a set of them. The current advice is to combine related images into a single file, download this, and use CSS positioning and clipping to render parts of this file. multipart/mixed would provide another route for downloading many resources at once. The only reference I can find to mobile usage of multipart-mixed is this tutorial from OpenWave: http://developer.openwave.com/dvl/support/documentation/technical_notes/multipart.htm >From running this experiment with desktop browsers, multipart-mixed doesn't seem to be well supported. I've set up an HTTP response matching the above and found that: - Firefox and Opera render the second page in the message - Safari doesn't recognise it as HTML and downloads it - IE renders content from both pages I've also got a question of how, from within CSS or similar, an individual part of a multipart-mixed message might be uniquely referred. The only reference I can find for a URL-scheme for such things is a scheme for references to body parts of messages, which date back to 1997 or earlier, and seem to be designed with HTML email in mind: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2392.txt Beyond the Openwave tutorial, and the following tool which exists to create these messages: http://www.umts-tools.org/docs/multipart/ ...I can't find any other reference to them; and it's not a technique I've come across myself. Am I missing something obvious here? From where I'm sitting this looks like a barely-used, poorly- supported technique which I'd hesitate to consider a best practice - though it might be handy if it worked. Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-mwabp-20090507/#d1e8981 -- Future Platforms: hungry and foolish since 2000 work: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com play: tomhume.org
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 16:08:23 UTC