public-appformats@w3.org from March 2008 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Monday, 17 March)

Arthur Barstow

• [widgets] Minutes from 27 March 2008 Widgets Voice Conference (Thursday, 27 March)
• What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Monday, 24 March)
• [widgets] Minutes from 13 March 2008 Widgets Voice Conference (Thursday, 13 March)
• [widgets] Minutes from 6 March 2008 Widgets Voice Conf (Thursday, 6 March)
• [widgets] Minutes from 28 February 2008 Widgets Voice Conf (Monday, 3 March)

Byungjung Kim

• [widgets] Hello ! (Thursday, 27 March)

Cameron McCormack

• Fw: XBL 2.0 implementation made available for major browsers (Wednesday, 5 March)

Collin Jackson

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Monday, 17 March)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Friday, 14 March)

Hal Lockhart

• [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3 (Friday, 21 March)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Saturday, 15 March)

Ian Hickson

• RE: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Saturday, 29 March)
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)

Igor Netto

• RE: [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element (Monday, 17 March)

John Panzer

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Access Control Spec and Cookies (Saturday, 1 March)

Julian Reschke

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Sunday, 16 March)

Kris Zyp

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Saturday, 15 March)

Laurens Holst

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Friday, 14 March)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Friday, 14 March)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: [widgets] Hello ! (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: [widgets] Minutes from 27 March 2008 Widgets Voice Conference (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: [widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• [widgets] Digital Signatures (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: [Widgets] confi.xml - author element (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Widgets] Digital Signatures (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [widgets] Widgets Landscape and specs (Thursday, 6 March)

Sean Hogan

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Sunday, 16 March)

Sergey Ilinsky

• Re: Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Monday, 17 March)
• Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Wednesday, 12 March)

Sergiu Dumitriu

• Re: Fw: XBL 2.0 implementation made available for major browsers (Wednesday, 5 March)

Sunava Dutta

• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Access Control Spec and Cookies (Friday, 14 March)

SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS

• [Widgets] confi.xml - author element (Tuesday, 11 March)
• [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element (Tuesday, 11 March)

Thomas Landspurg

• Re: Widgets 1.0 - widget settings: publishing / modifications (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element (Thursday, 13 March)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: [widgets] Minutes from 27 March 2008 Widgets Voice Conference (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests (Monday, 17 March)

Travis Leithead

• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] (Wednesday, 26 March)

Last message date: Saturday, 29 March 2008 22:23:19 UTC