Re: [Widgets] confi.xml - icon element

Hi Thomas and Benoit,
I'm open to the idea. Lets investigate this a bit more seriously, what
roles do you have in mind?

In regards to big and small, Microsoft addressed this issue by
allowing the an author to include icons of various sizes (eg. 16x16,
32x23, 64x64, etc). The widget engine then intelligently selects the
appropriate icon based on the available size for the display context.

Kind regards,
Marcos



On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Thomas Landspurg
<thomas.landspurg@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Hello Benoït,
>
>  I like the idea of the role, and it's an elegant way to solve some issues
> linked with multiple icons needs (big, small, etc...) So yes, why not define
> some standards roles, and if role is not defined, it's a default role which
> is taken?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:40 AM, SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS
> <benoit.suzanne@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi All
> > About the icon element, we have not stated what the role should be but I
> can think of the following elements:
> >
> > >>>>>
> > <widget xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets"
> >         id="http://example.org/widget"
> >         version="2.0 Beta"
> >         height="200"
> >         width="200">
> > ..../...
> >   <icon role="small" src="icons/widget-icon.png" />
> >  <icon role="favicon" src="icons/widget-favicon.png" />
> >  <icon role="screenshot" src="icons/widget-screenshot.png" />
> > .../...
> > </widget>
> > <<<<<
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Benoit
> >
> >
> >
> > Benoit  Suzanne
> > Widget Factory Project Manager - Orange Labs - FT/RD/SIRP/SOL/SLAM
> > t. +33 (0)145 298  198 - m. +33 (0)680 287 553
> > benoit.suzanne@orange-ftgroup.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Landspurg
> CTO
> http://www.webwag.com
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Thursday, 13 March 2008 09:34:01 UTC