public-appformats@w3.org from October 2007 by date

Wednesday, 31 October 2007

• Re: Design issues for access-control Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Design issues for access-control Thomas Roessler
• Re: Design issues for access-control Anne van Kesteren
• Design issues for access-control (Re: Lightning talk about access-control) Thomas Roessler

Thursday, 25 October 2007

• Re: Lightning talk about access-control Anne van Kesteren
• [access-control] renaming the draft Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

• Re: [widget] Remarks on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-widgets-20071013/ Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] Authenticated GET requests Ian Hickson
• Re: [access-control] Authenticated GET requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [access-control] Authenticated GET requests Ian Hickson
• [access-control] Authenticated GET requests Anne van Kesteren
• [widget] Remarks on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-widgets-20071013/ Innovimax SARL

Sunday, 21 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Ian Hickson

Saturday, 20 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Lightning talk about access-control Jonas Sicking
• Lightning talk about access-control Thomas Roessler

Friday, 19 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET authorization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [access-control] non-GET authorization Jonas Sicking
• Re: [access-control] non-GET authorization Ian Hickson
• Re: [access-control] non-GET authorization Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 18 October 2007

• [access-control] non-GET authorization Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 17 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 16 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Henri Sivonen
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Ian Hickson
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Bjoern Hoehrmann

Monday, 15 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Ian Hickson
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 12 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Mark Nottingham
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 11 October 2007

• [access-control] Forms WG comments on Access Control WD Klotz, Leigh
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

• Re: [WIDGETS] Using Zip based on OOXML-OPC, was [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WIDGETS] Using Zip based on OOXML-OPC, was [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 9 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Widgets] Manifest format Robin Berjon
• Re: [Widgets] Manifest format Jon Ferraiolo
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Henri Sivonen
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Thomas Roessler
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Thomas Roessler
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Henri Sivonen
• Re: [WIDGETS] Using Zip based on OOXML-OPC, was [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Thomas Roessler
• Re: [WIDGETS] Using Zip based on OOXML-OPC, was [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WIDGETS] Using Zip based on OOXML-OPC, was [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres
• [Widgets] Manifest format Marcos Caceres
• Re: [whatwg] Web widgets Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] Web widgets Cameron McCormack

Monday, 8 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WIDGETS] Using Zip based on OOXML-OPC, was [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Jon Ferraiolo

Sunday, 7 October 2007

• [WIDGETS] Using Zip based on OOXML-OPC, was [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres

Saturday, 6 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Henri Sivonen
• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Jonas Sicking

Friday, 5 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Ian Hickson
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Jon Ferraiolo
• [access-control] non-GET threat model and authorization choreography Henri Sivonen
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres

Thursday, 4 October 2007

• Re: XBL2 underspecified Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: XBL2 underspecified Ian Hickson
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Jon Ferraiolo
• Re: [access-control] Minor issues Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [access-control] Potential security problem (port should be auto-restricted) Anne van Kesteren
• [access-control] If-Method-Allowed -> Method-Check Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [access-control] Potential security problem (port should be auto-restricted) Thomas Roessler

Wednesday, 3 October 2007

• Re: [access-control] Potential security problem (port should be auto-restricted) Ian Hickson
• Re: [access-control] Potential security problem (port should be auto-restricted) Jonas Sicking
• Re: access-control Jonas Sicking
• Re: [access-control] Potential security problem (port should be auto-restricted) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XBL2 underspecified Gregory J. Rosmaita
• XBL2 underspecified Ian Hickson
• Re: [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Jon Ferraiolo
• access-control Ric Johnson
• [access-control] JSON Ric Johnson

Monday, 1 October 2007

• [access-control] json Ric Johnson

Wednesday, 3 October 2007

• [WIDGETS] Zip Support (request for comments) Marcos Caceres
• [access-control] Minor issues Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 2 October 2007

• [access-control] Potential security problem (port should be auto-restricted) Ian Hickson

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:11:39 UTC