- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: > > mea culpa -- i didn't mean the XBL specification itself, i was referring > to the XBL 2.0 Primer, but apparently i can't speak, minute, listen to > my screen reader, listen to the telecon and chew gum simultaneously -- > next time, i'll forgo the gum... Hehe. I'm curious what you mean by the primer being "underspecified" -- surely it's not specified at all? I mean, it's just a primer, a tutorial, it's not a specification or anything. I agree it's not complete yet, but that doesn't seem to affect the XBL technology itself from a technical perspective. Few W3C specs ever have any official primer written for them. I guess I'm just confused as to what the context of the discussion was in the minutes I cited. > i hope this clarifies my own mis-minuted comments -- i will re-review > the XBL2 draft itself with an ear towards identifying any possible holes > in the draft Great, thanks! > which -- in my opinion, at least -- is quite well specified, save for > those isolated spots where the draft acknowledges that further and/or > more suitable text is needed and will be added when it becomes > available, such as the disclaimer in section 8.2.2. -- the only minor > suggestion i have is that it would be helpful to indicate if the draft > is waiting for a description/definition from another forum/working > group, or whether the details are being worked on within the > public-appsformat forum... It's waiting on me, mostly. The description of the security model is one of the things I'm writing as part of the HTML5 effort. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:15:49 UTC