W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > August 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Dropping type from ... what?

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:36:24 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-134177469-1440419783-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> On 24 Aug 2015, at 14:31 , Stian Soiland-Reyes 
<notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> I say -1 to drop to SpecificResource - unless we are going for 
always having it as the object of hasBody / hasTarget (e.g. 
SpecificResource or equivalent specified as their rdfs:range).

You should look at:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Aug/0209.html

this is the direction we may be going…

Ivan



> Why? Because SpecificResource is a placeholder - and so this should 
be prominently marked beyond just a oa:hasSource.
> 
> Where's the issue suggesting this change to hasBody and hasTarget? 
It would be incompatible with earlier OA model - which should be part 
of the consideration.
> 
> How would oa:Choice etc. be used? Subclassing (whatever replaces) 
SpecificResource?
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704






-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by iherman
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/67#issuecomment-134177469
Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 12:36:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:39 UTC