Re: [web-annotation] Dropping type from ... what?

> On 24 Aug 2015, at 14:31 , Stian Soiland-Reyes 
<> wrote:
> I say -1 to drop to SpecificResource - unless we are going for 
always having it as the object of hasBody / hasTarget (e.g. 
SpecificResource or equivalent specified as their rdfs:range).

You should look at:

this is the direction we may be going…


> Why? Because SpecificResource is a placeholder - and so this should 
be prominently marked beyond just a oa:hasSource.
> Where's the issue suggesting this change to hasBody and hasTarget? 
It would be incompatible with earlier OA model - which should be part 
of the consideration.
> How would oa:Choice etc. be used? Subclassing (whatever replaces) 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
mobile: +31-641044153

GitHub Notif of comment by iherman

Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 12:36:26 UTC