[heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486)

The WebIDL specification includes some types which are really HTML-specific, such as DOMException. There are other places where HTML is referenced, though these seem to mostly be in examples; I have not gone through and examined them all yet.

If we want WebIDL to be most cleanly usable from the ECMAScript specification, ideally these would be factored out and put into a separate document (perhaps part of the HTML specification). I'm not sure, but maybe WebIDL would need some refactoring to permit certain types or extended attributes to be defined outside of its own document.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486