Re: [heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486)

I don't think that conclusion follows from that premise. E.g. URL works perfectly fine even on a platform that does not define DOMException, but it still normatively references Web IDL.

Perhaps you have some conception that documents which normatively reference each other require implementing the entire other document? That's not generally how we operate in the standards world; instead you only have to implement the parts that are directly referenced (e.g. via hyperlinks).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486#issuecomment-349442511