Re: [heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486)

Sorry, the "level" wording was clumsy; I am imagining something like multiple headings in the same document. I like core/extended better, and was definitely not intending to say that core would be "v1" and extended "v2".

There are some details to work out for where we'd want to put the split, but I'd say that "extended" would include things that we think of as "legacy" and web platform-specific things that we don't expect to be in common with other uses of JavaScript.

About the infra document in particular: Maybe we could upstream more parts of the infra document that make sense in pure ES into the ES spec.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486#issuecomment-349600162

Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2017 10:36:29 UTC