Re: [heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486) from Brian Terlson on 2017-12-05 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2017)

From: Brian Terlson <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:14:20 -0800
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/486/349443409@github.com>

I theorize that the subset of WebIDL we'd want for 262 is small enough relative to all of WebIDL that the benefits of @littledan's proposed layering will be pretty nice in terms of clarity and understandability. It also serves as a nice way to document the subset of WebIDL in use.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486#issuecomment-349443409

Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2017 21:14:42 UTC