Re: [heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486) from Anne van Kesteren on 2017-12-06 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2017)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 10:14:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/486/349594654@github.com>

One concern I have is that if we also change IDL to depend on Infra (as is the plan and already done to some extent) we'll have the same discussion there to create a subset of Infra for the bits only IDL needs.

And although you have helped with the aesthetics for some consumers, you've made it harder for lots of other folks to contribute and understand what's going on.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486#issuecomment-349594654

Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2017 10:14:27 UTC