public-script-coord@w3.org from October to December 2010 by author

Alex Russell

• Re: String enum pattern (Tuesday, 30 November)

Allen Wirfs-Brock

• RE: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Tuesday, 12 October)

Andrew Oakley

• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Tuesday, 23 November)

Anne van Kesteren

• String enum pattern (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: [webIDL] nullable interface types (Friday, 8 October)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Friday, 15 October)
• CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Saturday, 20 November)

Brendan Eich

• Re: Configurable, writable "const" values? (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Tuesday, 23 November)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 11485] New: Properties corresponding to operations should be enumerable (Monday, 6 December)
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type (Thursday, 2 December)
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [Bug 11451] New: Add a string enum type (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [Bug 11388] Add DOMTimeStamp (Tuesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11388] Add DOMTimeStamp (Tuesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11388] New: Add DOMTimeStamp (Tuesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11341] typo in 4.2.10: "[READ_ERROR]" should read "[Replaceable]" (Thursday, 18 November)
• [Bug 11341] typo in 4.2.10: "[READ_ERROR]" should read "[Replaceable]" (Thursday, 18 November)
• [Bug 11341] typo in 4.2.10: "[READ_ERROR]" should read "[Replacable]" (Thursday, 18 November)
• [Bug 11341] New: typo in 4.2.10: "[READ_ERROR]" should read "[Replacable]" (Thursday, 18 November)
• [Bug 11268] New: Make ES5 section number references less confusing (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11267] New: Add a [NonConfigurable] extended attribute (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11195] New: HTMLCollection wants to be an array (Tuesday, 2 November)
• [Bug 11185] New: Switch the order of checking for Function-ness and a property for [Callback] objects (Sunday, 31 October)
• [Bug 11175] Point out that the behaviour of assigning to properties corresponding to read only attributes (Saturday, 30 October)
• [Bug 11175] Point out that the behaviour of assigning to properties corresponding to read only attributes (Saturday, 30 October)
• [Bug 11176] New: Make properties on the global for interface object configurable (Saturday, 30 October)
• [Bug 11175] New: Point out that the behaviour of assigning to properties corresponding to read only attributes (Saturday, 30 October)
• [Bug 11098] Possible errors in integer and float regular expressions (Thursday, 28 October)
• [Bug 11138] New: Consider adding class/static methods (Sunday, 24 October)
• [Bug 11098] New: Possible errors in integer and float regular expressions (Tuesday, 19 October)
• [Bug 11056] New: Special operations should be overridable (Thursday, 14 October)
• [Bug 11033] New: Specify property enumeration order (Thursday, 14 October)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: a more JavaScripty binding for exceptions (Monday, 20 December)
• a more JavaScripty binding for exceptions (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Fwd: [WebIDL] summary of topics discussed at TC39 meeting (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: [WebIDL] summary of topics discussed at TC39 meeting (Monday, 29 November)
• [WebIDL] summary of topics discussed at TC39 meeting (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Friday, 19 November)
• [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Friday, 19 November)
• Omitting prototype objects for some interfaces (was: Re: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications) (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications (was: RE: Java bindings generated from Web IDL) (Sunday, 31 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] ES5 alignment: IE9's readonly and WebIDL configurable attribute (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Prod for T[] (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Prod for T[] (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Fw: Web IDL spec nitpick: SHOULD and SHOULD NOT? (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Typo in WebIDL? (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [webIDL] nullable interface types (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications (was: RE: Java bindings generated from Web IDL) (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [WebIDL] Prod for T[] (Thursday, 21 October)

Garrett Smith

• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)

Ian Hickson

• Re: a more JavaScripty binding for exceptions (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Thursday, 14 October)

Johnny Stenback

• Re: Configurable, writable "const" values? (Thursday, 2 December)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: a more JavaScripty binding for exceptions (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Configurable, writable "const" values? (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)

Michael Chan

• 1st CFP: IJCAI-11 Workshop on Discovering Meaning On the Go in Large & Heterogeneous Data (LHD-11) (Saturday, 18 December)

Olli Pettay

• Re: [WebIDL] prototype chains, multiple inheritance, mixin interfaces (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications (was: RE: Java bindings generated from Web IDL) (Sunday, 31 October)

Sam Weinig

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: Removal of identifierless getters, setters, etc. (Tuesday, 12 October)

Shiki Okasaka

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Tuesday, 12 October)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] interface objects with [Constructor] and [[Call]] (Friday, 8 October)

Travis Leithead

• RE: Configurable, writable "const" values? (Friday, 3 December)
• Configurable, writable "const" values? (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Omitting prototype objects for some interfaces (was: Re: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications) (Monday, 15 November)
• RE: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications (was: RE: Java bindings generated from Web IDL) (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications (was: RE: Java bindings generated from Web IDL) (Wednesday, 3 November)
• [WebIDL] ES5 alignment: IE9's readonly and WebIDL configurable attribute (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: Thoughts on ES5 binding modifications (was: RE: Java bindings generated from Web IDL) (Thursday, 21 October)
• RE: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)

Last message date: Monday, 20 December 2010 20:18:20 UTC