- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:48:28 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Travis Leithead <travil@microsoft.com>, Shiki Okasaka <shiki.okasaka@gmail.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Jonas Sicking: >> My gut reaction is to leave this out from the spec and not let WebIDL >> specify security aspects. > > Agreed. It’d be fine even for other specs (HTML5?) to define their own > security-related extended attributes to avoid writing prose that defines > when SECURITY_ERRs get thrown, but I don’t think the place to define > such an extended attribute is in Web IDL itself. Sounds good to me. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 21:49:17 UTC