W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: [webIDL] nullable interface types

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:33:01 +0200
To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vj8xxbe564w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:11:57 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:
> Dominique Hazael-Massieux:
>> Arguably, this is something that can be fixed in the Contacts API, but
>> before submitting the bug report, I was wondering what was the rationale
>> for forbidding the use of "?" on interface types; in particular:
>> • why interface types include the null value?
>> • why is it forbidden to make nullable a type that already includes the
>> null value?
>
> I just chose null to be in the interface types because I thought it was
> much more common to want reference values to be null than primitive
> values.  There is certainly an argument for changing this.  The
> alternative is to do something like what Anne has done in Web DOM Core,
> and use [NoNull] annotations (or we could introduce an "!" after
> interface names to “remove” null).  I’m open to opinions on which way to
> go.

There is an open bug report on this wherein Darin Adler suggests having  
non-nullable interface types by default rather than inventing a [NoNull]  
type. I think I like that better.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 08:40:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:03 UTC