public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from December 2011 by author

ashok malhotra

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: regrets for 20-Dec-2011 meeting (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Minutes from Dec 13 Telcon (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)

Boris Villazón Terrazas

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 13 December)

David McNeil

• Re: Handling Last Call Comments (Friday, 23 December)
• Full R2RML Review after ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-73 are resolved (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Handling Last Call Comments (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Thursday, 15 December)
• Handling Last Call Comments (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Diff of post-LC R2RML changes (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 13 December)
• tableName syntactic sugar (ISSUE-75) (Saturday, 10 December)
• Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)

Enrico Franconi

• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)

Joerg Unbehauen

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 13 December)

Juan Sequeda

• Re: regrets for 20-Dec-2011 meeting (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: regrets for 20-Dec-2011 meeting (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 13 December)

Marcelo Arenas

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 13 December)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes (Wednesday, 21 December)
• 2011-12-20 meeting minutes (Tuesday, 20 December)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: resignation from WG (Tuesday, 20 December)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 13 December)
• CANCELLED: RDB2RDF WG 2011-12-06 meeting (Monday, 5 December)

Pat Hayes

• resignation from WG (Tuesday, 20 December)

Percy Enrique Rivera Salas

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC (Tuesday, 20 December)

RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-78 (namespace-bugs): Minor bug in namespace document [Namespace] (Monday, 12 December)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: ISSUE-57 and ISSUE-72 implemented (was: Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes) (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes (Tuesday, 20 December)
• ISSUE-57 and ISSUE-72 implemented (was: Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes) (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Handling Last Call Comments (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Handling Last Call Comments (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Diff of post-LC R2RML changes (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables) (Monday, 12 December)
• Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: tableName syntactic sugar (ISSUE-75) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (Tuesday, 6 December)
• What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName? (Tuesday, 6 December)
• What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Implementing ISSUE-77 resolution on XSD 1.1 dependency (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Implementing ISSUE-76 resolution (changed term type default rules) (Tuesday, 6 December)

Souripriya Das

• regrets for 20-Dec-2011 meeting (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? (Wednesday, 7 December)

Last message date: Friday, 23 December 2011 14:43:03 UTC