W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Handling Last Call Comments

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:52:27 +0000
Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BFAF9725-8590-4DA6-AEF2-F860F76A2119@cyganiak.de>
To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
David,

These resources are available to document the WG's work since Last Call:

Diff:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/diffs/1.160-1.180.html

Summary of changes:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Last_Call_Changes_to_R2RML

Detailed changelog:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#cvs-history

Documentation of handling Last Call comments:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Last_Call

On 15 Dec 2011, at 13:50, David McNeil wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
>> On 13 Dec 2011, at 13:18, David McNeil wrote:
>> > So, question for the working group: is there a good way for me to see diffs between the last call version of the R2RML spec and the latest official version?
>> 
>> Not really I'm afraid. This might have to do: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/diffs/1.160-1.180.html
> 
> Hmm... the W3C process [1] seems to indicate that diffs need to be provided. I wonder if I am reading it right. It would certainly make sense to do this, otherwise it is not a very practical process for non-editors.

You say that “it is not a very practical process for non-editors”. I don't understand what you mean by that. Can you explain?

Best,
Richard
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 19:00:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 December 2011 19:00:36 GMT