W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > February 2009

Disposition of Last Call Comments

From: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:57:26 +0000
Message-ID: <498AD426.6010307@philarcher.org>
To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>

This e-mail is for archive purposes. It contains references to all the 
comments received in the two Last Call periods and the responses given.

(The Last Call for comments was initially made 15/8/08 to 14/9/08. The 
second last call period was 14/11/08 - 5/12/08. Most comments were 
received and dealt with in the first period. the second last call 
reflected the various changes made as a result).

This list does not include references to comments related to typos and 
minor editorial changes which have all been corrected/implemented. Where 
references are made to editors' drafts, the changes highlighted are 
expected to be maintained in the next published version of the relevant 
doc.

Phil Archer
===========
Confusion surrounding multiple displaytext/icon elements
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0004.html

Text clarified and now reads:
"User agents MAY display the text and/or icon to end users in any way 
deemed appropriate. Since a DR can contain any number of descriptorset 
elements and therefore any number of displaytext and displayicon 
elements, exactly how, or whether, these are displayed is up to the 
application. As a result, DR publishers are strongly advised to include 
no more than one displaytext and displayicon per DR."

Peter Patel-Schneider
=====================
Commented on the Formal Semantics document 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-formal-20080815/)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0013.html 
This contained many substantial (and welcome) comments which were dealt 
with in full.

Reply: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0019.html 
(no further replies)


Charles McCathieNevile
======================
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0020.html

Opera made two comments:
1. That 'Arbitrary RDF' should not be supported in POWDER as this 
entails including an RDF processor in a POWDER Processor.

Resolved yes
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-powderwg/2008Oct/0015.html

2. That we should retain mention of HTTP Link: as this is likely to be 
formalised.
resolved yes: It remains in the DR doc but is flagged as informative 
since, at the time of writing, the relevant IETF document is still an 
Internet Draft. See 
http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#httplink

Mark Nottingham
===============
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Aug/0000.html

This is not a Last Call comment as such (it pre-dates the LC period) 
however it was an important input. The end result was to change from 
suggesting a @rel value of powder to @describedby and defining two Media 
Types for POWDER and POWDER-S. See 
http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#assoc

Ivan Herman
===========
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0026.html

The question surrounded whether an rdfs;seeAlso property annotated the 
class or created a triple for each described URI.

Last in thread: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0035.html

The formal doc is very precise in saying:
"seealso, label, comment: Each of these elements is transformed into an 
annotation of the OWL class using the term from the rdfs vocabulary with 
which it shares a local name." See 
http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-formal/20090113.html#furtherDs

Addison Phillips
================
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Oct/0000.html

This lead to various revisions of the canonicalisation section of the 
Grouping doc. Now settled, see 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2009Jan/0031.html
and http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-grouping/20090121.html#canon

Michael Schneider
=================
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Oct/0023.html

Resolved as set out in 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2009Jan/0040.html

Régis Flad (ISAN)
=================
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Oct/0027.html

The text he provided is incorporated in the grouping doc, section 3.3 
http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-grouping/20090121.html#isan

Jonathan Rees and Julian Reschke
================================
Both asked why 'describedby' cf. 'meta'.
Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0022.html
and JR's reply:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0023.html

Jonathan Rees
=============
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0015.html
various comments on the Formal doc.

And again:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0025.html

Reply:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0025.html

And again:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0000.html

And the reply:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0044.html

Also Michael Schneider joined in at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0032.html

Final mail in the thread from POWDER WG:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0044.html

Dan Connolly
============
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0004.html

Reply:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0013.html

And
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0021.html

Dan Connolly 2
==============
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0005.html

All references to W3CDTF removed, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0015.html

Ivan Herman
===========
Queried our submission to IESG for MIME types using text/powder+xml
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0011.html

Initially we suggested that this was not an error. Eric Prud'hommeaux 
stepped in and helped out a great deal so that the Media Type 
registration was correctly formatted. To cut a very long thread short, 
see 
http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#appB. 
Philippe le Hegaret is now handling the submission which will be made 
once the relevant docs are in TR space.

Tony Hammond
============
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0031.html

and

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0037.html

Various e-mails resolved the issues. last in thread: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0043.html 
with proof of datatype handling at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0041.html


Yves Savourel
=============
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0046.html

Resolved yes, see 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2009Feb/0005.html 
and 
http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#localization

Eric Prud'hommeaux
==================
Eric picked up a discussion about the formal semantics. See 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0045.html
Which continued for a while to 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0065.html



-- 
Phil Archer
w. http://philarcher.org/
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 11:58:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:14 GMT