- From: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:57:26 +0000
- To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
This e-mail is for archive purposes. It contains references to all the comments received in the two Last Call periods and the responses given. (The Last Call for comments was initially made 15/8/08 to 14/9/08. The second last call period was 14/11/08 - 5/12/08. Most comments were received and dealt with in the first period. the second last call reflected the various changes made as a result). This list does not include references to comments related to typos and minor editorial changes which have all been corrected/implemented. Where references are made to editors' drafts, the changes highlighted are expected to be maintained in the next published version of the relevant doc. Phil Archer =========== Confusion surrounding multiple displaytext/icon elements http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0004.html Text clarified and now reads: "User agents MAY display the text and/or icon to end users in any way deemed appropriate. Since a DR can contain any number of descriptorset elements and therefore any number of displaytext and displayicon elements, exactly how, or whether, these are displayed is up to the application. As a result, DR publishers are strongly advised to include no more than one displaytext and displayicon per DR." Peter Patel-Schneider ===================== Commented on the Formal Semantics document (http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-formal-20080815/) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0013.html This contained many substantial (and welcome) comments which were dealt with in full. Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0019.html (no further replies) Charles McCathieNevile ====================== http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0020.html Opera made two comments: 1. That 'Arbitrary RDF' should not be supported in POWDER as this entails including an RDF processor in a POWDER Processor. Resolved yes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-powderwg/2008Oct/0015.html 2. That we should retain mention of HTTP Link: as this is likely to be formalised. resolved yes: It remains in the DR doc but is flagged as informative since, at the time of writing, the relevant IETF document is still an Internet Draft. See http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#httplink Mark Nottingham =============== http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Aug/0000.html This is not a Last Call comment as such (it pre-dates the LC period) however it was an important input. The end result was to change from suggesting a @rel value of powder to @describedby and defining two Media Types for POWDER and POWDER-S. See http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#assoc Ivan Herman =========== http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0026.html The question surrounded whether an rdfs;seeAlso property annotated the class or created a triple for each described URI. Last in thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Sep/0035.html The formal doc is very precise in saying: "seealso, label, comment: Each of these elements is transformed into an annotation of the OWL class using the term from the rdfs vocabulary with which it shares a local name." See http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-formal/20090113.html#furtherDs Addison Phillips ================ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Oct/0000.html This lead to various revisions of the canonicalisation section of the Grouping doc. Now settled, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2009Jan/0031.html and http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-grouping/20090121.html#canon Michael Schneider ================= http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Oct/0023.html Resolved as set out in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2009Jan/0040.html Régis Flad (ISAN) ================= http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Oct/0027.html The text he provided is incorporated in the grouping doc, section 3.3 http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-grouping/20090121.html#isan Jonathan Rees and Julian Reschke ================================ Both asked why 'describedby' cf. 'meta'. Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0022.html and JR's reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0023.html Jonathan Rees ============= http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0015.html various comments on the Formal doc. And again: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0025.html Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Nov/0025.html And again: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0000.html And the reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0044.html Also Michael Schneider joined in at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0032.html Final mail in the thread from POWDER WG: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0044.html Dan Connolly ============ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0004.html Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0013.html And http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0021.html Dan Connolly 2 ============== http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0005.html All references to W3CDTF removed, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0015.html Ivan Herman =========== Queried our submission to IESG for MIME types using text/powder+xml http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0011.html Initially we suggested that this was not an error. Eric Prud'hommeaux stepped in and helped out a great deal so that the Media Type registration was correctly formatted. To cut a very long thread short, see http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#appB. Philippe le Hegaret is now handling the submission which will be made once the relevant docs are in TR space. Tony Hammond ============ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0031.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0037.html Various e-mails resolved the issues. last in thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0043.html with proof of datatype handling at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0041.html Yves Savourel ============= http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0046.html Resolved yes, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2009Feb/0005.html and http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#localization Eric Prud'hommeaux ================== Eric picked up a discussion about the formal semantics. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0045.html Which continued for a while to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Dec/0065.html -- Phil Archer w. http://philarcher.org/
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 11:58:08 UTC