W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > December 2008

POWDER depends on a Note for date syntax?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:15:55 -0600
To: public-powderwg <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1228148155.6953.170.camel@pav.lan>

I see:

"The issued, validfrom, and validuntil elements in POWDER documents MUST
contain a W3C DTF literal value."

A normative dependency on a W3C Note doesn't seem like a good idea.
I suggest using the XSD spec as the definition of date syntax.

XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition
W3C Recommendation 28 October 2004
This version:
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 1 December 2008 16:16:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:42 UTC