W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > November 2012

2nd Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 26 November, 4 p.m. UTC

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:01:11 +0100
Message-ID: <50B39247.7090202@w3.org>
To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Small corrections + regrets.

- Felix

Time: 26 November, 4 p.m. UTC. See 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Main_Page#Upcoming

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20121126T16

DIAL IN DETAILS: 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Dial_in_info_for_regular_call

Regrets: Christian, Naoto, Jörg

1) Test suite
Leroy et al. are only "managing" the test suite - data category owners 
need to play an active role in checking and creating the files. Goal: 
distribute related action items. Leroy, feel free to create a wish list 
before the call of areas that want contributions and also people you'd 
like to engage.

Discussion on nature of M2, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Nov/0071.html
Question: which approach to choose for M2, see above mail.


2) Drop localization quality precis
Not a lot of work has gone into this data category (e.g. action-295 
checking global rules example in localization precis is not done), and 
the implementation commitment is thin. I propose to drop this from the 
last call draft - implementors can do what Pedro et al. did with 
"readyness". Once lq precis is stable it can go into the next version of 
ITS. Thoughts?


3) Issues

3.1) New issues
For the "last call" draft we need to be free of issues in the spec. 
Please think hard about what could stop us from moving forward.

3.2) Closing ISSUE-42 tools information
Missing bit: tools information in global rules handling, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0194.html
Comments before the call are very welcome :)
Latest thread at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0203.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0204.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0205.html


4) Actions needed for the LC draft

action-286 Put data category table into non-normative appendix in the spec
Shaun, can you get this done by 26 November, so that we have time for a 
review?

action-297 Address Query Language related Ed notes in draft
Jirka, same question.
Also related: do you think the update of the RELAX NG schema in sec.
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#its-schemas
will be in time? Should these schemas be normative then?
Both questions answered here
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0201.html
"Normative" part may need some clarification.

action-314 Check global rules for provenance
done, see thread at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0189.html
Is there a need to make edits before the last call draft for this?
action-315 Rework 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/xml/EX-provenance-global-3.xml 
to use XLIFF
how does this related to action-314 and what edits are needed?

action-308 update list of pointer attributes done, see 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#pointer-attributes-list
including Yves' feedback at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0200.html

action-311 check about harmonization of interval values. Done, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0191.html
question: and further action for last call draft needed?

action-313 check data category overview table - done, see 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#datacategories-overview

Reviewer for changes needed - see the changes described at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0202.html


5) Editing calls Tue - Wed
It might make sense to have the 3-4 hours spend in this way: decide what 
to edit, edit in parallel, review edits together.


6) Stability of quality issue types
are the qi types stable to be implemented? Daniel Naber (language tool 
developer) is asking. See further feedback here
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0206.html
and Arle's reply here
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0208.html

7) AOB


8) EU PROJECT SPECIFIC (but no secrets, everybody feel free to stay)

presentations and public outreach - input needed for M12 report - work 
package sanity check.

- Felix
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 16:01:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC