W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 26 November, 4 p.m. UTC

From: Jörg Schütz <joerg@bioloom.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:39:24 +0100
Message-ID: <50B3710C.6030009@bioloom.de>
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Felix,

My regrets, today I can't participate in the call.

Sorry and cheers -- Jörg

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:22 (UTC+1), Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Changes:
> - Yves' mail about M2 added to test suite topic. May influence the M2
> characteristics.
> - Further changes to the draft, need reviewer.
> - toolsRef thread
> - qi type feedback
>
>
> Time: 26 November, 4 p.m. UTC. See
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Main_Page#Upcoming
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20121126T16
>
> DIAL IN DETAILS:
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Dial_in_info_for_regular_call
>
>
> 1) Test suite
> Leroy et al. are only "managing" the test suite - data category owners
> need to play an active role in checking and creating the files. Goal:
> distribute related action items. Leroy, feel free to create a wish list
> before the call of areas that want contributions and also people you'd
> like to engage.
>
> Discussion on nature of M2, see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Nov/0071.html
> Question: which approach to choose for M2, see above mail.
>
>
> 2) Drop localization quality precis
> Not a lot of work has gone into this data category (e.g. action-295
> checking global rules example in localization precis is not done), and
> the implementation commitment is thin. I propose to drop this from the
> last call draft - implementors can do what Pedro et al. did with
> "readyness". Once lq precis is stable it can go into the next version of
> ITS. Thoughts?
>
>
> 3) Issues
>
> 3.1) New issues
> For the "last call" draft we need to be free of issues in the spec.
> Please think hard about what could stop us from moving forward.
>
> 3.2) Closing ISSUE-42 tools information
> Missing bit: tools information in global rules handling, see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0194.html
> Comments before the call are very welcome :)
> Latest thread at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0203.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0204.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0205.html
>
> 4) Actions needed for the LC draft
>
> action-286 Put data category table into non-normative appendix in the spec
> Shaun, can you get this done by 26 November, so that we have time for a
> review?
>
> action-297 Address Query Language related Ed notes in draft
> Jirka, same question.
> Also related: do you think the update of the RELAX NG schema in sec.
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#its-schemas
> will be in time? Should these schemas be normative then?
>
> action-314 Check global rules for provenance
> done, see thread at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0189.html
> Is there a need to make edits before the last call draft for this?
> action-315 Rework
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/xml/EX-provenance-global-3.xml
> to use XLIFF
> how does this related to action-314 and what edits are needed?
>
> action-308 update list of pointer attributes done, see
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#pointer-attributes-list
>
> action-311 check about harmonization of interval values. Done, see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0191.html
> question: and further action for last call draft needed?
>
> action-313 check data category overview table - will be done by Tuesday
>
> Reviewer for changes needed - see the changes described at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0202.html
>
>
> 5) Editing calls Tue - Wed
> It might make sense to have the 3-4 hours spend in this way: decide what
> to edit, edit in parallel, review edits together.
>
>
> 6) Stability of quality issue types
> are the qi types stable to be implemented? Daniel Naber (language tool
> developer) is asking. See further feedback here
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0206.html
>
>
> 7)AOB
>
>
> 8) EU PROJECT SPECIFIC (but no secrets, everybody feel free to stay)
>
> presentations and public outreach - input needed for M12 report - work
> package sanity check.
>
> - Felix
>
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 13:39:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC