- From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:40:56 -0400
- To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Cc: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 19:41:24 UTC
Forgive me if this does not apply to XSD 1.1 but contrary to your write up sequence is not a subcase of xsd:all because xsd:all has severe cardinality restrictions in that it is limited to 0 or 1 occurrence which would prohibit it's use even where unordered semantics are explicitly desired. On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear list, > I've been thinking on this topic for a while, and I thought I must > write a technical document about it to share with like minded people. I've > attempted to compare the XSD <sequence> and <all> constructs in this > document. The link is below. > > https://sites.google.com/site/gandhimukul/xml/sequenceVsAll_xsd.pdf > > If anyone on this list gets time to read this document, it'll be great. > I'll happily respond to any mails on this via this list, and perhaps modify > the referred document as per comments from anyone on this list. > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi >
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 19:41:24 UTC