W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2009

[XML Schema 1.1] Is vc:type(Un)Available and vc:facet(Un)Available redundant?

From: Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:04:03 -0400
To: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9E51F88D5247B648908850C35A3BBB500400458C28@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>

Hi Folks,

If I specify vc:minVersion and vc:maxVersion doesn't that dictate what types and facets are available?

For example, if I specify vc:minVersion="1.1" and vc:maxVersion="1.1" doesn't that mean vc:typeAvailable="xs:precisionDecimal" and vc:facetAvailable="xs:assert" are true?

It occurs to me that vc:type(Un)Available and vc:facet(Un)Available are never needed; my desires can always be specified just by using vc:minVersion and vc:maxVersion. Do you agree?

Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 15:04:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:51 UTC