- From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:41:03 +0200
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, "'Crni Gorac'" <cgorac@gmail.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> And, adding to Mike's answer, the schema workgroup is devoting a lot of
> effort to choosing the right features for Schema 1.1 that would allow just
> such co-occurrence constraints to be expressed. Though I can't officially
> commit anything, I would expect to see at least some initial proposals in
> whatever is the next public working draft of the Schema 1.1 specification.
> Stay tuned.
>
hi,
I'm playing with an alternate schema technology that can build content
models dynamically, as shown in this example :
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/tutorial.html#N801359
Thus, co-occurrence constraints are easy to achieve with the Active
Schema Language :
http://disc.inria.fr/perso/philippe.poulard/xml/active-tags/active-schema/active-schema.html
Of course, this is still experimental, but it's worth seeing ; there are
lots of ideas that might interest the schema workgroup.
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 12:27:52 UTC