- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:52:38 -0400
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: "'Crni Gorac'" <cgorac@gmail.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
And, adding to Mike's answer, the schema workgroup is devoting a lot of
effort to choosing the right features for Schema 1.1 that would allow just
such co-occurrence constraints to be expressed. Though I can't officially
commit anything, I would expect to see at least some initial proposals in
whatever is the next public working draft of the Schema 1.1 specification.
Stay tuned.
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
"Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Sent by: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
05/12/2006 04:43 PM
To: "'Crni Gorac'" <cgorac@gmail.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
Subject: RE: specify element type depending of same element
attribute value?
> First problem is related to case
> when type of contents of a simple element (not containing nested
> element) is determined by this element attribute value.
This is one of the most well-known restrictions in XML Schema. The type of
an element is determined solely by its element name (and perhaps the
context
in which the element appears, and perhaps the xsi:type attribute). You
can't
write content models that depend on the presence or value of an attribute.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 20:52:54 UTC