- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:46:57 +0100
- To: "'Kelso, Simon'" <skels@allstate.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <012801c67605$35a18650$6401a8c0@turtle>
Impossible to give a definitive answer without seeing a sample. And it might be impossible even then, because the XML Schema spec give a lot of latitude to implementations on this kind of thing. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ _____ From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kelso, Simon Sent: 10 May 2006 22:16 To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: Schema Query re import and defines Hi Im not sure if I am mailing to the correct group or not. We are having a few problems with consistency with validation tools for XML schemas. We have a main schema, extensions schema and an plug-in schema that combines the two. Descriptions on each are shown below: Main Schema - contains data dictionary of all types, elements etc Extensions Schema - contains business area specific types not contained in the Main Schema - however these can be made up of types 'Imported' from the main schema, therefore this schema imports from the Main Schema (note that it uses IMPORT as it is a different namespace as the main schema. The plug-in schema - which 'Redefines' types from the Main schema and 'Imports' from the Extensions Schema. One validation tool validates our schema's ok, however one tool says that the item being redefined is declared twice (therefore fails validation) - this is because the plug-in schema is indirectly importing the definition (From the Main Schema) via the Extensions schema, while at the same time doing a redefine from the Main Schema. What tool is correct ? and is it valid what we are doing ? Thanks Simon.
Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 20:47:27 UTC