xmlp-comments@w3.org from January 2004 by subject

Bad link in specs [was: SOAP 1.1 w3c Recommendation ??]

• David Fallside (Wednesday, 7 January)

Comments on SOAP 1.2 Rec docs

• David Fallside (Thursday, 8 January)

Issue 14rec Closed

• David Booth (Saturday, 3 January)

Issue 17rec Closed

• Carine Bournez (Wednesday, 21 January)

Issue 442 closed

• Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 28 January)

Issue 7rec Closed

• Chin Chee-Kai (Saturday, 17 January)

MTOM, constraints on nodes types

• Herve Ruellan (Thursday, 29 January)

New MTOM & XOP Issue: what if the input contains a xop:include?

• noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 January)

New MTOM Issue: SOAP processing model and Representation Header

• noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 28 January)

Resolution for Issue 440

• noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 26 January)
• Martin Gudgin (Monday, 26 January)
• Martin Gudgin (Monday, 26 January)
• Martin Gudgin (Monday, 26 January)

Resolution for Issue 446

• noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Martin Gudgin (Monday, 26 January)

Resolution of XMLP Rec Issue 17

• David Fallside (Wednesday, 21 January)

Resolution to Rec-Issue-17

• David Fallside (Wednesday, 21 January)

Round 4- 20040116 - SOAP v1.2(c) Test Collection

• cheekai@SoftML.Net (Monday, 19 January)

T20 is missing

• Zhu Li Qiang (Monday, 5 January)

XMLP issue 445 closed

• David Fallside (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Jacek Kopecky (Wednesday, 14 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 29 January 2004 10:52:03 UTC