xmlp-comments@w3.org from January 2004 by date

Thursday, 29 January 2004

• MTOM, constraints on nodes types Herve Ruellan

Wednesday, 28 January 2004

• Issue 442 closed Jacek Kopecky
• New MTOM Issue: SOAP processing model and Representation Header noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Resolution for Issue 446 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 26 January 2004

• RE: Resolution for Issue 440 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Resolution for Issue 446 Martin Gudgin
• Resolution for issue 440 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Resolution for Issue 440 Martin Gudgin
• Resolution for Issue 440 Martin Gudgin

Wednesday, 21 January 2004

• Issue 17rec Closed Carine Bournez
• Resolution of XMLP Rec Issue 17 David Fallside
• Resolution to Rec-Issue-17 David Fallside

Monday, 19 January 2004

• Round 4- 20040116 - SOAP v1.2(c) Test Collection cheekai@SoftML.Net

Saturday, 17 January 2004

• Re: Issue 7rec Closed Chin Chee-Kai

Thursday, 15 January 2004

• New MTOM & XOP Issue: what if the input contains a xop:include? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 14 January 2004

• Re: XMLP issue 445 closed David Fallside
• XMLP issue 445 closed Jacek Kopecky

Thursday, 8 January 2004

• Comments on SOAP 1.2 Rec docs David Fallside

Wednesday, 7 January 2004

• Fw: Bad link in specs [was: SOAP 1.1 w3c Recommendation ??] David Fallside

Monday, 5 January 2004

• T20 is missing Zhu Li Qiang

Saturday, 3 January 2004

• Re: Issue 14rec Closed David Booth

Last message date: Thursday, 29 January 2004 10:52:03 UTC