RE: Resolution for Issue 440

Martin Gudgin writes:

> I trust the resolves the issue to your satisfaction.

In this case, I would like the record to show that I believe we have 
probably made a mistake here, at least in the case of allowing the HTTP 
binding to carry unreferenced parts.  I think this is unnecessary and a 
potential back-door threat to interoperability.

That said, I do not wish to formally contest this decision but merely to 
log my opinion in the record.  I therefore agree to accept the resolution 
as you've summarized it. 

BTW:  your email to me included a cc: to Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com.  That 
address is no longer valid and mail sent to it may (or may not) bounce. My 
correct business email address is Noah_Mendelsohn@us.ibm.com.   Thank you!

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Sent by: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org
01/26/2004 06:26 AM

 
        To:     <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
        cc:     "Mendelsohn, Noah" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, (bcc: Noah 
Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        RE: Resolution for Issue 440



And heres the reference

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x440 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Gudgin 
> Sent: 26 January 2004 11:26
> To: 'xmlp-comments@w3.org'
> Cc: Mendelsohn, Noah
> Subject: Resolution for Issue 440
> 
> Noah,
> 
> You raised Issue 440[1] regarding multiple references to a 
> single MIME part and unreferenced MIME parts in MTOM/XOP.
> 
> The XMLP WG has resolved this issue as follows:
> 
> XOP will allow unreferenced MIME parts
> MTOM and HTTP binding will allow unreferenced MIME parts but 
> such MIME parts play no part in SOAP processing.
> 
> XOP will allow multiple refs per binary part MTOM will allow 
> multiple refs per binary part HTTP binding will allow only 
> one ref per binary part
> 
> I trust the resolves the issue to your satisfaction.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Martin Gudgin
> For the W3C XMLP WG
>

Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 14:58:54 UTC