Thursday, 1 August 2002
- XMLP Issue 268 Closed
- XMLP WG Issue 242 Resolution
- XMLP WG Issue 240 Resolution
- XMLP Issue 251 Closed
Wednesday, 31 July 2002
- issue 336, length of URIs, is closed
- Resolution of issue 241
- FW: QA WG Review of the XML Protocol SOAP 1.2 specification
- followup to previous email
- RE: QA WG Review of the XML Protocol SOAP 1.2 specification (fwd)
- resolution of LC issue 220
- Re: issue 249
- Re: issue 249
- LC Issue 246 closed
- Re: issue 249
- resolution of issue 252
- issue 249
Tuesday, 30 July 2002
- SOAP and Processing Instructions
- issue 227
- resolution of issue 228
- Comment for SOAP Version 1.2 Last Calls
Monday, 29 July 2002
- FW: Last Call comments on SOAP 1.2 from the XForms WG
- Re: SOAP 1.2 LC Issue: Clarification on Use of what SOAP Faults Mean when not Direct and Only Child of Body
Friday, 26 July 2002
- Re: Resolution of LC issue #208
- Re: WSAWG Comments on SOAP 1.2 LC WDs
- WSAWG Comments on SOAP 1.2 LC WDs
Thursday, 25 July 2002
Wednesday, 24 July 2002
- Re: LC Issue 216 Closed
- Re: LC Issue 215: closed, text accepted
- Re: LC Issue 214: closed, editorial : text accepted
- Re: LC Issue 213: closed, editor : text moved
- Re: LC Issue 212: closed, editorial, clarification approved
- Re: LC Issue 211: closed, editorial : text changed
- Re: LC Issue 210: closed, text accepted
- LC Issue 210: closed, text accepted
- Re: LC Issue 226 Resolution
Tuesday, 23 July 2002
Monday, 22 July 2002
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Implementation Summary (SOAP::Lite implementation)
- RE: LC Issue 215: closed, text accepted
- LC Issue 215: closed, text accepted
Saturday, 20 July 2002
Friday, 19 July 2002
- LC comment on SOAP 1.2 part 2 from Oracle.
- SOAP 1.2 LC Issue: Clarification on Use of what SOAP Faults Mean when not Direct and Only Child of Body
- SOAP 1.2 LC Issue: Use of "" in encodingStyle Attribute
- SOAP 1.2 LC Issue: Clarification on Use of SOAP Detail Element
- SOAP 1.2 LC issue: Two inconsistencies in SOAP-defined fault codes
- SOAP 1.2 LC Issue: Clarification on Use of Multiple Fault Codes
- SOAP 1.2 LC Issue: Clarification that HTTP does define a base URI
- LC comments on SOAP 1.2 adjuncts: re SOAP Encoding (re URIs, test suite, SOAP Data Model Schemas?)
- Comments on SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer
- Editorial comments on Primer
- LC Issue 214: closed, editorial : text accepted
- overrestrictive constrainsts for "SOAP header block" and "SOAP Body child Element"?
- LC Issue 213: closed, editor : text moved
- LC Issue 211: closed, editorial : text changed
- Systinet Last Call comments
- Expectation of SOAP message processing
- Message in Example 2 in Primer doesn't match prose exactly
Thursday, 18 July 2002
Wednesday, 17 July 2002
- Re: LC Issue 226 Resolution
- LC issue (part2): message exchange context out of nowhere?
- LC issue (primer): replace "::::" by "..." (editorial)
- Resolution of LC issue #208
Tuesday, 16 July 2002
Monday, 15 July 2002
- Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231)
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Last Call comments
- SOAP 1.2 Last Call comments
Saturday, 13 July 2002
- general comments to SOAP Version 1.2 (parts 0-2)
- I18N-related comments to SOAP Version 1.2 (parts 0-2)
Friday, 12 July 2002
- Comments on SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer
- Re: XMLP Last Call
- READING THIS CAN CHANGE YOUR LIFE!
- comments from P3P Specification working group
- RE: LC Editorial comment SOAP1.2 Part2
- Re: LC Editorial comment SOAP1.2 Part2
- Re: LC editorial nit: missing dot
- Re: LC: SOAP 1.2 part 1: editorial nit
Thursday, 11 July 2002
- LC Editorial comment SOAP1.2 Part2
- Re: LC Issue 207: closed, no action
- LC Issue 216 Closed
- LC Issue 212: closed, editorial, clarification approved
- LC Issue 209: closed, editorial, suggested change approved
- LC Issue 207: closed, no action
- LC Issue 225: closed, editorial, suggested text approved
- RE: Resolution Text for Last Call Issue 222
- RE: XMLP LC Issue #218
Wednesday, 10 July 2002
Thursday, 4 July 2002
Wednesday, 3 July 2002
- LC: SOAP 1.2 Assertions and Test Collection: Editorial
- LC: SOAP 1.2 part 1: editorial nit
- LC: Assertion and Test Collection doc: missing assertion: editorial
- Change maximum arraySize value to "unbounded"
- LC editorial nit: missing dot
Tuesday, 2 July 2002
- Re: Conflict between empty role value and SOAP 1.2's use of xml:base
- Conflict between empty role value and SOAP 1.2's use of xml:base
- [Fwd: LC issue list]