Re: LC Issue 210: closed, text accepted

Thank you.  This note is to formally signal my satisfaction with this 
resolution.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------







Don Mullen <donmullen@tibco.com>
07/24/2002 04:24 PM

 
        To:     "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
        cc:     "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
        Subject:        LC Issue 210: closed, text accepted



Noah,

The XMLP WG has decided to close issue 210 [1] by accepting your text. The
change is as follows:

<original>
Each SOAP header block element information item:
 * MUST have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that
   is, be namespace qualified.
 * MAY have an encodingStyle attribute information item in its
   [attributes] property.
 * MAY have an role attribute information item in its [attributes]
   property.
 * MAY have a mustUnderstand attribute information item in its
   [attributes] property.
</original>

<newText>
Each SOAP header block element information item:

MUST have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is, MUST be
namespace qualified.

MAY have any number of character information item children.  Child 
character
information items whose character code is amongst the whitespace 
characters
as defined by [XML 1.0] are considered significant.

MAY have zero or more attribute information items in its [attributes]
property.  Among these MAY be any or all of the following, which have
special significance for SOAP processing: 
 - encodingStyle attribute information item (see 5.1.1 SOAP encodingStyle
Attribute).
 - role attribute information item (see 5.2.2 SOAP role Attribute).
 - mustUnderstand attribute information item (see 5.2.3 SOAP 
mustUnderstand
Attribute).
</newText>

Regards,

Don Mullen (on behalf of the XML Protocol WG)

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x210

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 19:40:40 UTC