- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 19:39:31 -0400
- To: Don Mullen <donmullen@tibco.com>
- Cc: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Thank you. This note is to formally signal my satisfaction with this resolution. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Don Mullen <donmullen@tibco.com> 07/24/2002 04:24 PM To: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> cc: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org> Subject: LC Issue 210: closed, text accepted Noah, The XMLP WG has decided to close issue 210 [1] by accepting your text. The change is as follows: <original> Each SOAP header block element information item: * MUST have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is, be namespace qualified. * MAY have an encodingStyle attribute information item in its [attributes] property. * MAY have an role attribute information item in its [attributes] property. * MAY have a mustUnderstand attribute information item in its [attributes] property. </original> <newText> Each SOAP header block element information item: MUST have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is, MUST be namespace qualified. MAY have any number of character information item children. Child character information items whose character code is amongst the whitespace characters as defined by [XML 1.0] are considered significant. MAY have zero or more attribute information items in its [attributes] property. Among these MAY be any or all of the following, which have special significance for SOAP processing: - encodingStyle attribute information item (see 5.1.1 SOAP encodingStyle Attribute). - role attribute information item (see 5.2.2 SOAP role Attribute). - mustUnderstand attribute information item (see 5.2.3 SOAP mustUnderstand Attribute). </newText> Regards, Don Mullen (on behalf of the XML Protocol WG) [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x210
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 19:40:40 UTC