resolution of LC issue 220

Stuart,
At the f2f the WG decided to close issue 220 [1] you raised [2] by changing
the text in Part 1, section 3.1, last paragraph (based on the email
exchange between you and Noah [3]):

<originalText>
A binding specification that expresses such features external to the SOAP
envelope needs to define its own processing rules to which a SOAP node is
expected to conform (for example, describing what information is passed
along with the SOAP message as it leaves the intermediary). It is
recommended that, where practical, end-to-end features be expressed as SOAP
header blocks, so that the rules defined by the SOAP Processing Model can
be employed.
</originalText>

<newText>
A binding specification that expresses such features external to the SOAP
envelope needs to define its own processing rules for those externally
expressed features.  A SOAP node is expected to conform to these processing
rules (for example, describing what information is passed along with the
SOAP message as it leaves the intermediary). The processing of SOAP
envelopes in accordance with the 2.  SOAP Processing Model MUST NOT be
overridden by binding specifications.
</newText>

Please let us know if this is not satisfactory

Regards,
Colleen

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues#x220
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jun/0120.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0217.html