- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 10:26:59 -0500
- To: xml-encryption@w3.org
Hi,
- I think the Abstract is a bit strong and general. How about
something more like
This document specifies a "decryption transform" for use in XML
Digitial Signatures such that, in many cases, it is possible to
detect subsequent signature invalidating encrytions and undo
them.
- Why is it only applicable to EncryptedData? Why shouldn't I be able
to have a signature that includes an EncryptedKey in its scope and
still protect it?
- Much of the XML is clipped by the right margin when I print it on
paper.
- First sentence of section 6.1: I don't see that this has the power
to permit or prohibit anything. How about "facilitate" instead of
"permit".
Thanks,
Donald
=====================================================================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd dee3@torque.pothole.com
155 Beaver Street +1 508-634-2066(h)
Milford, MA 01757 USA +1 508-261-5434(w)
Received on Sunday, 11 November 2001 10:29:23 UTC