W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > November 2001

Decryption Transform Specification

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 10:26:59 -0500
Message-Id: <200111111526.KAA0000103364@torque.pothole.com>
To: xml-encryption@w3.org

- I think the Abstract is a bit strong and general.  How about
something more like

     This document specifies a "decryption transform" for use in XML
     Digitial Signatures such that, in many cases, it is possible to
     detect subsequent signature invalidating encrytions and undo

- Why is it only applicable to EncryptedData? Why shouldn't I be able
to have a signature that includes an EncryptedKey in its scope and
still protect it?

- Much of the XML is clipped by the right margin when I print it on

- First sentence of section 6.1: I don't see that this has the power
to permit or prohibit anything. How about "facilitate" instead of


 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd                      dee3@torque.pothole.com
 155 Beaver Street                                +1 508-634-2066(h)
 Milford, MA 01757 USA                            +1 508-261-5434(w)
Received on Sunday, 11 November 2001 10:29:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:05 UTC