- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 10:26:59 -0500
- To: xml-encryption@w3.org
Hi, - I think the Abstract is a bit strong and general. How about something more like This document specifies a "decryption transform" for use in XML Digitial Signatures such that, in many cases, it is possible to detect subsequent signature invalidating encrytions and undo them. - Why is it only applicable to EncryptedData? Why shouldn't I be able to have a signature that includes an EncryptedKey in its scope and still protect it? - Much of the XML is clipped by the right margin when I print it on paper. - First sentence of section 6.1: I don't see that this has the power to permit or prohibit anything. How about "facilitate" instead of "permit". Thanks, Donald ===================================================================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd dee3@torque.pothole.com 155 Beaver Street +1 508-634-2066(h) Milford, MA 01757 USA +1 508-261-5434(w)
Received on Sunday, 11 November 2001 10:29:23 UTC