- From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:38:31 +0900
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>, xml-encryption@w3.org
Donald, Thank you for your comments. >- I think the Abstract is a bit strong and general. How about >something more like > > This document specifies a "decryption transform" for use in XML > Digitial Signatures such that, in many cases, it is possible to > detect subsequent signature invalidating encrytions and undo > them. I'm happy to use your text. >- Why is it only applicable to EncryptedData? Why shouldn't I be able >to have a signature that includes an EncryptedKey in its scope and >still protect it? You can have such a signature, and this transform does not do anything for EncryptedKey elements in its scope. >- Much of the XML is clipped by the right margin when I print it on >paper. > >- First sentence of section 6.1: I don't see that this has the power >to permit or prohibit anything. How about "facilitate" instead of >"permit". Joseph, could you fix these? Thanks, Takeshi IMAMURA Tokyo Research Laboratory IBM Research imamu@jp.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 01:39:02 UTC