xml-editor@w3.org from January to March 2001 by date

Tuesday, 27 March 2001

• BaseChar problem in XML 1.0? Martin v. Loewis
• Annex B should use Unicode 3.0 Martin v. Loewis

Tuesday, 13 March 2001

• Difference between XML declaration and text declaration Martin Duerst

Monday, 12 March 2001

• Re: [Moderator Action] XML language, rule [14]: CharData Dan Connolly

Monday, 5 March 2001

• Possible problem with formatting of XML 1.0 2e Eve L. Maler

Sunday, 25 February 2001

• erratum concerning standalone richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk

Monday, 19 February 2001

• make allowance for "non-English" characters in public identifiers Paul Grosso

Thursday, 8 February 2001

• RE: BaseChar problem in XML 1.0? Mark Davis
• RE: BaseChar problem in XML 1.0? Francois Yergeau

Monday, 5 February 2001

• BaseChar problem in XML 1.0? Andy Heninger

Monday, 22 January 2001

• "but not both" is misleading muraw3c@attglobal.net

Tuesday, 16 January 2001

• XML Rec and Error behavior Karl Dubost

Sunday, 14 January 2001

• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models? Daniel Veillard
• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models? James Clark
• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models? Daniel Veillard

Friday, 12 January 2001

• Re: Publishing XML spec with errata included Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Publishing XML spec with errata included Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Section 2.10 spelling error in 2nd editon of XML spec Elliotte Rusty Harold

Wednesday, 3 January 2001

• »¶Ó­Äú¼ÓÈëÒױصÃÉÌÎñÍø ÒױصÃ

Friday, 5 January 2001

• A decouvrir Promocanape@w3.org

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 March 2001 11:50:30 UTC