Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... from Rich Salz on 2006-01-18 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2006)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:23:57 -0500 (EST)
To: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
cc: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0601181621470.26878-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> Indeed, I'd say that the intermediary is responsible
> for ensuring that the 2nd hop binding can faithfully implment the MEP used
> by the first hop.

I'm inclined to agree with this, I just don't know how the intermediary
knows the MEP.  Short of making SOAP (or at least non-default MEPs) depend
on WSDL, then the messages themselves must be tagged, right?

	/r$

-- 
SOA Appliance Group
IBM Application Integration Middleware
* This address is going away; please use rsalz@us.ibm.com *

Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:30:44 UTC