RE: Agenda: 30 June 2006 WS Description telcon

My belated (well, they aren't belated now, but they will be by the time
my plane lands and this message goes out) regrets - I'm on my way home
from ApacheCon Europe today.

--G 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 2:38 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda: 30 June 2006 WS Description telcon
> 
> 
> 0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]: 
> 
> See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents 
> and other
> information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
> 
> If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
> before the start of the telcon. 
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jun/0021.html
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Agenda 
> 
> 1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of: 
>       David Orchard, Bijan Parsia, Charlton Baretto, 
>       Umit Yalcinalp, Asir Vedamuthu, Roberto Chinnici, 
> 	Gilbert Pilz, Paul Downey, Tom Jordahl, Anish Karmarkar
>       Glen Daniels
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2.  Approval of minutes: (Youenn was also present.)
>   - June 15 [.1]
> 
> [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/att-00
> 58/2006061
> 5-ws-desc-minutes.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3.  Review of Action items [.1]. 
> 
> Interop
> ?         2006-06-01: [interop] Jonathan to add sorting of 
> soap modules,
>                       http/soap headers.
> ?         2006-06-01: [interop] John to file issue whether {rpc
>                       signature} should be OPTIONAL (4.1.1).
> ?         2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for 
>                       an unknown extension wsdl:required=true.
> ?         2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for 
>                       an unknown extension wsdl:required=false.
> ?         2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to write test cases 
> for messages 
>                       and message exchanges for a simple WSDL (eg: an 
>                       echo web service).
> ?         2006-06-15: [interop] Jonathan to build a new XSLT to 
>                       construct the validation reports. 
> 
> WG
> ?         2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group 
>                       report for requirements for schema evolution 
>                       following closure of LC124 
> ?         2006-03-30: Marsh to make XSLT improvements for RDF
>                       publication. 
> ?         2006-04-20: Glen to flesh out a model for runtime test
>                       scenarios.
> ?         2006-06-08: Charlton to review the text appropriate to CR44 
>                       to ensure that it is adequately explanatory.
> ?         2006-06-08: Gil to write a response to the raiser of CR47.
> ?         2006-06-15: Jonathan to file the issue rpc signature issue. 
> ?         2006-06-15: Arthur to update CR022 proposal. 
> ?         2006-06-15: Arthur to propose part 1 test about REQUIRED 
>                       extensions.
> 
> Current Editorial Action Items
>  - none -
> 
> Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2]. 
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4.  Administrivia
>   a. Next telcon 6 July (from Toronto!)
>   b. Interop event, July 5-7, Toronto, hosted by IBM.  Logistics [.1]
>   c. Interop TF progress report?
> 	Issue CR050? Policy on REQUIRED properties of OPTIONAL
> extensions
>   d. SPARQL wsdl bug [.2]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/6/07/interop-logistic.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0127.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 5.  Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1]
>   - Terminology clarification [.2]
>   - WS-Addressing example [.3]
>   - Arthur's proposed clarification [.4]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 6.  Issue CR037: Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [.1]
>   - Arthur looking into why one might need these media types.
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR037
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 7.  Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently 
> with each 
>                  other [.1]
>   - Reopen this issue ? [.2]
>   - ACTION: Charlton to review the text appropriate to CR44 to ensure 
>             that it is adequately explanatory
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 8.  Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1]
>   - Status quo [.2]
>   - ACTION: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding schema 
>             without namespace [.3]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0097.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 9.  Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding
> [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 10. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 11. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR054
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 12. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1]
>   - Arthur's proposal [.2]
>   - ACTION: Jacek to write a clarification to Arthur's proposal, 
>     explaining that BindingFault is correct, not BindingFaultReference
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 13. Issue CR056: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension
>     properties [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR056
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 14. Issue CR057: HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not 
> xs:QName [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR057
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 15. Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR058
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 16. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited}
>                  appear? [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR059
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 17. Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http 
>                  authentication scheme} match? [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR060
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 18. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in 
>                  example - should be NCNames [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR061
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 19. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in 
>                  example - should be NCNames [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR062
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 20. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR063
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 21. Features "at risk"
>   - Features and Properties [.1] Director's decision [.2]
>     + collecting data on f&p deployment
>   - HTTP Binding
>     + awaiting data from implementers
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Apr/0014.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Dec/0023.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 30 June 2006 12:30:25 UTC