- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:37:45 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]: See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jun/0021.html [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin -------------------------------------------------------------------- Agenda 1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of: David Orchard, Bijan Parsia, Charlton Baretto, Umit Yalcinalp, Asir Vedamuthu, Roberto Chinnici, Gilbert Pilz, Paul Downey, Tom Jordahl, Anish Karmarkar Glen Daniels -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Approval of minutes: (Youenn was also present.) - June 15 [.1] [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/att-0058/2006061 5-ws-desc-minutes.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Review of Action items [.1]. Interop ? 2006-06-01: [interop] Jonathan to add sorting of soap modules, http/soap headers. ? 2006-06-01: [interop] John to file issue whether {rpc signature} should be OPTIONAL (4.1.1). ? 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for an unknown extension wsdl:required=true. ? 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for an unknown extension wsdl:required=false. ? 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to write test cases for messages and message exchanges for a simple WSDL (eg: an echo web service). ? 2006-06-15: [interop] Jonathan to build a new XSLT to construct the validation reports. WG ? 2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group report for requirements for schema evolution following closure of LC124 ? 2006-03-30: Marsh to make XSLT improvements for RDF publication. ? 2006-04-20: Glen to flesh out a model for runtime test scenarios. ? 2006-06-08: Charlton to review the text appropriate to CR44 to ensure that it is adequately explanatory. ? 2006-06-08: Gil to write a response to the raiser of CR47. ? 2006-06-15: Jonathan to file the issue rpc signature issue. ? 2006-06-15: Arthur to update CR022 proposal. ? 2006-06-15: Arthur to propose part 1 test about REQUIRED extensions. Current Editorial Action Items - none - Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2]. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Administrivia a. Next telcon 6 July (from Toronto!) b. Interop event, July 5-7, Toronto, hosted by IBM. Logistics [.1] c. Interop TF progress report? Issue CR050? Policy on REQUIRED properties of OPTIONAL extensions d. SPARQL wsdl bug [.2] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/6/07/interop-logistic.html [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0127.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1] - Terminology clarification [.2] - WS-Addressing example [.3] - Arthur's proposed clarification [.4] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022 [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Issue CR037: Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [.1] - Arthur looking into why one might need these media types. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR037 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 7. Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each other [.1] - Reopen this issue ? [.2] - ACTION: Charlton to review the text appropriate to CR44 to ensure that it is adequately explanatory [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044 [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1] - Status quo [.2] - ACTION: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding schema without namespace [.3] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045 [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0097.html [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 10. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR054 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1] - Arthur's proposal [.2] - ACTION: Jacek to write a clarification to Arthur's proposal, explaining that BindingFault is correct, not BindingFaultReference [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055 [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- 13. Issue CR056: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR056 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 14. Issue CR057: HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR057 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 15. Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR058 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 16. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited} appear? [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR059 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 17. Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http authentication scheme} match? [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR060 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 18. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in example - should be NCNames [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR061 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 19. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in example - should be NCNames [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR062 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 20. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR063 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 21. Features "at risk" - Features and Properties [.1] Director's decision [.2] + collecting data on f&p deployment - HTTP Binding + awaiting data from implementers [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Apr/0014.html [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Dec/0023.html
Received on Friday, 23 June 2006 18:39:03 UTC