- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:53:38 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
David Orchard, Bijan Parsia, Charlton Baretto,
Umit Yalcinalp, Asir Vedamuthu, Jacek Kopecky,
Roberto Chinnici, Glibert Pilz, Paul Downey, Tom Jordahl
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- June 8 [.1]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/att-0033/2006060
8-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
Interop
? 2006-05-11: [interop] Chairs to invite XFire to join this
call per Tom Jordahl's suggestion
? 2006-05-11: [interop] Jonathan to look into how to create
SOAP 1.2 services with .NET.
? 2006-06-01: [interop] Arthur to add wrappers to the schema.
? 2006-06-01: [interop] Arthur to put parent, features,
properties in the base schema.
? 2006-06-01: [interop] Jonathan to add sorting of soap modules,
http/soap headers.
? 2006-06-01: [interop] John to file issue whether {rpc
signature} should be OPTIONAL (4.1.1).
? 2006-06-01: [interop] Jonathan to publicize interop event.
? 2006-06-08: [interop] Somebody to create a testcase for
an unknown extension wsdl:required=true.
? 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to write test cases for messages
and message exchanges for a simple WSDL (eg: an
echo web service).
WG
? 2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
? 2006-03-30: Marsh to make XSLT improvements for RDF
publication.
? 2006-04-20: Glen to flesh out a model for runtime test
scenarios.
? 2006-06-08: Charlton to review the text appropriate to CR44
to ensure that it is adequately explanatory.
[.3] DONE 2006-06-08: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding
schema without namespace.
? 2006-06-08: Gil to write a response to the raiser of CR47.
? 2006-06-08: JacekK to respond to Jonathan re: cf050.
? 2006-06-08: Jacek to write a clarification to Arthur's
proposal, explaining that BindingFault is correct,
not BindingFaultReference.
Current Editorial Action Items
- none -
Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Next telcons (Off June 22 for WS-I plenary.)
b. Interop event, July 5-7, Toronto, hosted by IBM. Logistics [.1]
c. Interop TF progress report?
d. SPARQL wsdl bug [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/6/07/interop-logistic.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0127.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5. Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1]
- Terminology clarification [.2]
- WS-Addressing example [.3]
- Arthur's proposed clarification [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6. Issue CR037: Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [.1]
- Arthur looking into why one might need these media types.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR037
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each
other [.1]
- Reopen this issue ? [.2]
- ACTION: Charlton to review the text appropriate to CR44 to ensure
that it is adequately explanatory
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1]
- Status quo [.2]
- ACTION: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding schema
without namespace [.3]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0097.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding
[.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052
-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053
-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR054
-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1]
- Arthur's proposal [.2]
- ACTION: Jacek to write a clarification to Arthur's proposal,
explaining that BindingFault is correct, not BindingFaultReference
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue CR056: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension
properties [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR056
-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue CR057: HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR057
-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR058
-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited}
appear? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR059
-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http
authentication scheme} match? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR060
-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in
example - should be NCNames [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR061
-----------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in
example - should be NCNames [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR062
-----------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR063
-----------------------------------------------------------------
21. Features "at risk"
- Features and Properties [.1] Director's decision [.2]
+ collecting data on f&p deployment
- HTTP Binding
+ awaiting data from implementers
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Apr/0014.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Dec/0023.html
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2006 21:55:02 UTC