- From: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:44:10 +0100
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Regrets for today's telecon, as I am travelling. -Charlton. On Wednesday, July 19, 2006, at 08:15PM, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> wrote: > >0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]: > >See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other >information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters. > >If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list >before the start of the telcon. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jul/0006.html >[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ >[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >Agenda > >1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of: > Asir Vedamuthu, Gilbert Pilz, Paul Downey, > Philippe Le Hegaret, Tom Jordahl, Anish Karmarkar, Glen Daniels, > Amelia Lewis, Youenn Fablet, Jean-Jacques Moreau, Allen Brookes, > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >2. Approval of minutes: > - July 13 [.1] > >[.1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/att-0064/2006071 >3-ws-desc-minutes.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >3. Review of Action items [.1]. > >[Interop] >DONE [.3] 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for > an unknown extension wsdl:required=true. >DONE [.3] 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for > an unknown extension wsdl:required=false. >? 2006-07-06: [interop] Jonathan - create validation-report > stylesheet. >? 2006-07-07: [interop] John to write spec text for transfer > coding >? 2006-07-07: [interop] Arthur to include counts of good/bad > documents in document coverage report > >WG >? 2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group > report for requirements for schema evolution > following closure of LC124 >? 2006-03-30: Marsh to make XSLT improvements for RDF > publication. >? 2006-06-15: Arthur to update CR022 proposal. >? 2006-06-15: Arthur to propose part 1 text about REQUIRED > extensions. >? 2006-06-29: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify > the issue in CR53. >? 2006-07-06: Glen to contribute some extension test cases. >? 2006-07-06: John to write proposal for CR055 based on > discussion and Jacek's email. >? 2006-07-13: Roberto to produce an updated proposal for CR044. > >Current Editorial Action Items > - none - > >Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2]. > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions >[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0065.html > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >4. Administrivia > a. Need telcon 27 July? August off, resuming Sept. 7 > b. SPARQL wsdl bug [.1] > c. WSDL 1.1 schemas [.2] > d. Multiple ports [.3] > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0127.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0059.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0069.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >5. Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each > other [.1] > - Reopen this issue to change the syntax? [.2] > - Components of the latest proposal: > + Roberto [.3] > + Jacek [.4] > + amendment? "applies to" terminology [.5, .6] > + amendment? don't mention interface [.7] > - ACTION: Roberto to produce an updated proposal for CR044 > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0046.html >[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0014.html >[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0047.html >[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0054.html >[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0055.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >6. Issue CR076: {rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not > specified? [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR076 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >7. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1] > - Arthur's proposal [.2] > - ACTION: John to write proposal for CR055 based on discussion and > Jacek's email > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >8. Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR058 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >9. Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http > authentication scheme} match? [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR060 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >10. Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1] > - Terminology clarification [.2] > - WS-Addressing example [.3] > - Arthur's proposed clarification [.4] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html >[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >11. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1] > - ACTION: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify the > issue in CR53 > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >12. Issue CR069: Deconstructing MEPs [.1] > - Amy's pushback [.2] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR069 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0036.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >13. Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding >[.1] > - ACTION: Jacek to draft a response to Eric re: CR052 explaining that > this represents a new use case, and that we will not be able > to address this as such in the spec, but that it can be > addressed as an additional extension... [.2] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0034.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >14. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1] > - ACTION: Jacek to write a response to Eric correcting his > interpretation of the text as described in CR054 [.2] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR054 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0035.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >15. Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1] > - Status quo [.2] > - ACTION: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding schema > without namespace [.3] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0097.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >16. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited} > appear? [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR059 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >17. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in > example - should be NCNames [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR061 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >18. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in > example - should be NCNames [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR062 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >19. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR063 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >20. Issue CR066: Endpoint component {name} property vs xml >representation > as a QName [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR066 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >21. Issue CR068: WSDL 2.0 part 2 comment - 2.3.x, 2.2.x wording problems > [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR068 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >22. Issue CR064: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR064 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >23. Issue CR065: Re: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR065 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >24. Issue CR021: Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety [.1] > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR021 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >25. Features "at risk" > - Features and Properties [.1] Director's decision [.2] > + collecting data on f&p deployment > - HTTP Binding > + awaiting data from implementers > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Apr/0014.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Dec/0023.html > > > > -- charlton_b@mac.com +1.650.222.6507 m +1.415.692.5396 v http://charltonb.typepad.com
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2006 15:44:20 UTC