- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 13:36:46 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004May/0002.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jeff Mischkinsky, Asir Vedamuthu, Glen Daniels,
Roberto Chinnici, Amy Lewis, Erik Ackerman, Adi Sakala,
Arthur Ryman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- April 22th [.1]
- April 29th [.2]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/att-0085/22-ws-d
esc-irc.html
[.2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/att-0088/040429-
ws-desc-irc.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
DONE [.2] 2004-01-08: Pauld to write up examples of schemas for the
Primer.
? 2004-01-28: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for
test suite.
? 2004-02-12: DaveO to produce a refined proposal for Asynch
HTTP binding addressing the concerns of folks
that object to leaving replyTo info out of WSDL.
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
? 2004-04-29: Arthur to write up concerns about XML 1.1
implications on WSDL 2.0 for potential
forwarding to XML WG.
DONE [.3] 2004-04-29: Hugo to redraft DaveO's proposal for extensible
HTTP
operations.
DONE [.4] 2004-04-29: Marsh to add an issue on describing the XML
version
of SOAP messages.
? 2004-04-29: Umit to work with Anish to create a working draft
on
media types ready for our May F2F meeting in
NYC.
? 2004-04-29: Part 1 editors to adopt Jacek's "purpose of the
binding" text, without "interchangeable"
endpoints,
and using "confidentiality" (or similar) instead
of TLS.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0007.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0093.html
[.4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x171
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTFs
- May 19, 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
May 20, 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
1:30 PM - 3:30 PM testing task force meeting?
May 21, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM
Hosted by IBM in NYC [.1], registration open [.2]
- August 2-4 (London)
Logistics [.3], registration [.4].
- September 14-16 (Toronto) [.5]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-05-f2f.htm
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/WSD0405/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-08-f2f.htm
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Mar/0064.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004May/0000.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Task Force Status.
a. Media type description
- Draft of first WD for WG approval by May FTF.
b. QA & Testing
- Suggested QA plan [.1]
- More details from Arthur [.2]
c. Schema versioning
- Waiting to hear back from Schema on my draft "charter."
- Henry's validate-twice write-up [.3]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/att-0029/QA_Oper
ational_Checklist.htm
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0037.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0019.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues. Issues list [.1].
- Issue 172: Syntax improvement for soap fault bindings (Sanjiva) [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0081.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method [.1]
- Hugo's original proposal [.2]
- DaveO's original proposal [.3]
- Hugo's combined proposal [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x54
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0042.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0055.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0093.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. HTTP Features review.
- David's analysis [.1]. Summary:
- Request-Method already described
- Request-URI already described
- HTTP Version probably useful
- Response Status probably useful
- Content coding probably useful
- Transfer Codings (Chunked encoding) probably useful
- Persistent connections probably not useful
- Redirection probably useful
- Authentication probably useful
- SSL probably useful
- From probably not useful
- Caching (Vary, etc.) probably useful
- Content Negotiation probably useful
- Host already described
- Content-Range not useful
- If-* not useful
- Max-Forwards not useful
- Expect not useful
- Upgrade not useful
- Via not useful
- Warning not useful
- Allow probably not useful
- Content-Language not useful
- Content-Location not useful
- Content-MD5 not useful
- Date not useful
- Etag not useful
- Expires not useful
- Last-Modified not useful
- Referrer not useful
- Retry-After not useful
- Server, User-Agent probably not useful
- Partial Content not useful
- Content-disposition probably not useful
- PICS, P3P not useful
- SoapAction already described
- Cookies probably useful
- WebDAV probably not useful
- Delta Encoding ?
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0083.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. SOAP 1.2 Binding
- Review Jean-Jacques' schema [.1, .2] outlining an overall approach
to the binding.
- Issue 172: Simplify code/subcode syntax [.3]
- Sanjiva's proposal [.4]
- Roberto's amendment [.5]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0295.html
[.2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-bindings.
html#_soap_binding_syntax
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x172
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0081.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0001.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTTP Features - Scheduled for future telcons, dependent on overall
review of HTTP features.
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue 165: Adding HTTPS support [.1]
- Still debating whether to put a specific marker in the binding
re: https (probably delay this; group with other HTTP features.)
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x165
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 147: HTTP binding uses static content-type header [.1]
- "... we can today describe operations using messages
consisting in XHTML or SVG documents. Using the HTTP binding,
these messages will have the "application/xml" mime type
while it would be more appropriate to use more precise mime
types ("application/xhtml+xml" or "image/svg+xml" for
instance). Therefore, it might be good to be able to set the
mime type to use for a given message, at least at the HTTP
binding level ..."
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x147
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue 55: Define binding to HTTP headers [.1]
- Do we want such capability?
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x55
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue 56: Define means to specify an authentication requirement [.1]
- attempt to clarify commentor's intent
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x56
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0033.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue 164: Support for HTTP chunking and other HTTP options [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x164
------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled for future telcons
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Effort to simplify our spec.
- DavidB [.1] and Jonathan [.2] have provided some data points.
- Arthur's suggestion [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0162.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0028.html
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 16:37:42 UTC