Re: Requiredness (two issues)

Glen Daniels wrote:
> -2-
> 
> Second, reading through the way we specify the co-occurrence constraint
> between property/constraint and property/value, I found it a little
> confusing.  I think it would be nice to explicitly say something up
> front along the lines of:
> 
> "{value} OPTIONAL.  The value of the property.  If {value} is specified,
> the effect is to force a particular value for the {constraint} property
> (see below)."

There are some other edits pending on that section, see [1], so the
text you propose is not up-to-date.

Roberto

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0283.html

Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 18:38:37 UTC