W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168)

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:40:46 -0700
Message-ID: <32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF091D1909@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Would it be possible to have wording that is testable as well?


-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 1:10 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168)

I'm trying incorporate the wording that we came up with during the May
15th telecon:

If GEDs are NOT unique, then the WSD MUST somehow indicate, as
a mandatory extension, what mechanism is required to
determine the interface operation component.

I'm unclear where to incorporate this.

It seems to belong in the description of Interface Operation 
components, but that's carefully written in terms independent of XSD
and XML type system lingo. This particular thing is written for
XML type systems .. do we want to fix that or put this in as-is
(with an additional clause saying "if the message reference components
are defined using an XML type system AND if the GEDs are ...")?

Please advice. Cut-n-pasteable words would be even more welcome.

Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 17:41:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:43 UTC